Release date: 2015-06-10

“Precise medicine” is actually a new formulation of “individualized medicine”: it means giving everyone the right medicine at the right time. However, because it was proposed by Obama and given a certain amount of government investment at the time of the proposal, there was a brand. With influence, it seems that there is also a "theoretical basis". The country is swarming up to embrace the concept. The small meeting of the conference is constantly, and they all take precision medicine to say things.

Americans don't buy it, use "the problem with precision medicine" as the key word. Simple Google will find that almost all major newspapers have articles that question this "sport":

Where is the problem? As the New Yorker magazine article says:

" However, the excitement surrounding personalized medicine has outpaced the science." The problem is that after the Americans experienced the disappointment of the completion of the genomic engineering (there was no practical medicine), the slogan of this type of politician is very natural. First ask the question mark.

A similar "sport" has been launched by almost every US president, from Nixon's "declaration of cancer" to Clinton's celebration of the completion of the human genome project. Obama has not paid much, and the money of 200 million US dollars can make many scientists rejoice. I doubt that behind this movement are some American sequencing companies.

I think that if you use a target to compare precision medicine, the real precision should be where to play, and now the so-called precision medicine is what to play.

True precision medicine has the highest diagnostic requirements, not a simple diagnosis, but a differential diagnosis. Know the cause, but also know the disease condition subdivided into individual levels. Second, drugs are individualized at all stages of development and use. This will make every effort.

The current situation is that the diagnosis is far from accurate, and neither the etiology diagnosis nor the differential diagnosis is in place. Drugs have been developed based on uncertain, non-individualized diagnoses. So what today's "precise medical treatment" can do is not really to improve the effect, but at best it can reduce some side effects. Because it is aimed at the precise treatment of existing drugs, the drug has been developed, the bomb has already gone out, so talk about precision, that is, what to call.

Another problem is that when it comes to precision medicine, everyone immediately thinks about sequencing, and it is genome sequencing. In fact, the genomes inherited from parents do not contain all disease information, and genetic mutations are not the cause of most diseases. Disease, like health, is the result of interaction between the genome and the environment. Therefore, just looking at the "drawings" given by parents can never get accurate medical treatment.

Like Li Keqiang, Obama is a super sales manager for a national product. Li Keqiang visited South America and hoped that everyone would buy China's high-speed rail technology; Obama would also try to get the world to buy American sequencing technology. A "precise medical" formulation, with a total of 215 million US dollars, will allow scientists around the world to voluntarily advertise (because there is research funding available), why not?

Don't misunderstand, I am not saying that precision medicine is wrong, not good. I hope that you will not take good wishes as a reality, see what is worth doing and what can be done. To say the concept, whoever, the concept of precision medicine, the dialectical treatment in Chinese medicine has long been summed up, not something new.

In the case of cancer treatment, from the surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, to the current immunotherapy, the effect is gradually improved, but it is not directly diagnosed. The tumor genome sequencing project has also been done for a long time, and it has not provided a better treatment plan, and there is no good target. Many "individualized therapies" of "concomitant diagnosis" are not good medicines for hand-to-disease, but the best way to avoid unnecessary poisoning.

"In today's world, the competition in science is the competition in the shopping mall. The innovation brings huge economic benefits, sometimes more than a war." This is the opening of a blog post a few years ago. . I am a natural and optimistic person, and it is rare to pour cold water. However, I think everyone should really be awake, don't let a fast-decisive US president fool.

Source: Science Network Blog / Han Jian

Dried White Garlic

Introduction:
The bulb of garlic,an allium plant in the lily family.with the pungent flavor and spicy taste.spherical shape with a diameter of 3-6.5cm. The surface is covered with white and papery-skin.
The top is slightly pointed, with residual scape in the middle,many fibrous root marks at the base. After peeling off the skin, a single head or 6 to 16 petal-shaped small bulbs, inserted around the base of the remaining flower stems. The bulbous valve is slightly ovoid, with a membranous outer skin, slightly pointed at the apex, and an arcuate bulge on one side.
In order to ensure the maximum freshness and nutrients.
We adhere to the traditional natural drying method without any human intervention.

Specification
Brand:Changrong
Variety:Liliaceous Vegetables
Color:Pure white/Normal white
Nutrition:
Manganese: 2% of the Daily Value
Vitamin B6: 2% of the DV
Vitamin C: 1% of the DV
Selenium: 1% of the DV
Fiber: 0.06 grams
Decent amounts of calcium, copper, potassium, phosphorus, iron and vitamin B1

Dried White Garlic,Dried Whole Garlic ,Dehydrating Whole Garlic Cloves,Dried White Garlic Flowers

shandong changrong international trade co.,ltd. , https://www.cragriculture.com