Once again, milk powder has caused renewed interest in the food industry. In recent days, news about New Zealand milk powder dicyandiamide has once again caused widespread concern. For those mothers who are eating their own baby milk powder, they can not help but ask: What milk powder has been tested for dicyandiamide? What else can you feel comfortable eating? Do you really want to raise your own cow?

See here, we do not first find New Zealand milk powder in the end there is no dicyandiamide residue? Perhaps our consumers are too sensitive, and the food industry will tighten its already fragile nerves if there is a bit of trouble. But in anti-sense, New Zealand, as the world’s largest exporter of dairy products, is also China’s largest source of dairy products. At present, 80% of domestic imported raw milk powder comes from there. It is detected that containing toxic substances, which means domestic Almost all milk powder can't run off. How does this affect people's urgency?

Dicyandiamide is a raw material for melamine production. The content of dicyandiamide is more or less harmful to the human body. However, there is no clear study yet. It is necessary to further conduct its toxicological studies before it can be confirmed to what extent it harms the human body. Pay attention to recent food safety incidents. From the media to experts and companies, you will find that they all seem to be good at playing "words."

Dicyandiamide is obviously harmful to the body, but it is said that there is currently no limit standard for dicyandiamide in dairy products. This argument seems to push the responsibility down, because there is no limit standard for dicyandiamide. In other words, after the issue was revealed, the official website from New Zealand stated that the dicyandiamide manufacturer suspended its application because of accidental detection of trace residue in milk and only in a small amount of milk powder. It is found in the product and does not exist in other dairy products such as cream or cheese. A statement was issued stating that the dicyandiamide detected this time was "more toxic than salt."

Such a phrase has long been not the first case. After the tumultuous plasticizer incident in the liquor industry was exposed, its response was overwhelming and deeply hurt the hearts of consumers. From the beginning, it was repeatedly clarified that white spirit was qualified and it was not clear to the state. Standards, experts, and even plasticizers are harmless, and even professors have no problem in arguing that adults can resist melamine. Finally, the development of cross-line seasonings with plasticizers is 400 times more effective than liquor spirits. People have to think that this series of arguments are justified. They do not understand why food safety problems have arisen. First, the response of enterprises or businesses is to deny them, and then the national standard is not clear, as if it were an international standard. The saying is a magic weapon forever, so that when the country has been a headache milk powder no longer give the "national standard" to exploit the loophole?